Categories
Uncategorized

“Act of vindictiveness:” Delhi High Court Women Lawyers Forum writes to DHCBA over police raid at office of Mehmood Pracha

Raids in the office of Mr. Mahmood Pracha, Advocate is the latest example of such intimidation by the Delhi Police. Mr. Pracha is representing several accused persons in the recent riot cases in Delhi. The recent trend indicates that there are other lawyers too who are being intimidated and discouraged from representing their clients in these cases. However, this is also a larger issue that goes beyond the riots case, wherein lawyers who are vocal about defending civil liberties are being systematically targeted,” the statement reads.

The statement has been signed by advocates Anuradha Dutt, Malavika Rajakotia, Ritu Bhalla, Warisha Farasat, Naomi Chandra, Pooja Saigal, Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Anubha Rastogi, Anjali Sharma, Saumya Tandon, Nandita Rao, Iram Majid, Ragini Vinaik, Suruchi Suri, Kirti Singh, Shweta Kapoor, Gayatri Virmani, Sumita Kapil, Miriam Fozia Rahman, Manali Singhal, Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Swaty Singh Malik, Ruchi Singh, Mani Gupta, Tanima Kishore, Tarannum Cheema, Mahjabeen, Anupam Sanghi, Aakanksha Nehra and Shahrukh Alam.

Pracha, who has been representing the accused in Delhi riots cases, was raised by the Delhi Police on December 24. The Police claimed that it was searching for “incriminating documents” and meta data of the outbox of the official email id of Pracha’s firm.

He later moved the Patiala House court in Delhi seeking preservation of copies of the video footage of the raids conducted by Delhi police at his office on Thursday.

The Court has asked Delhi Police’s response on Pracha’s plea and also directed the investigating officer to be present in the court on the next hearing date along with the complete video footage of the search on Pracha’s office premises.

This content was originally published here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *